The recent discourse surrounding DOGE has sparked an intense debate about its role in uncovering deep-seated issues within the political system. While global concerns such as open borders, rampant crime, the devastation of natural disasters, and international conflicts have been brushed aside by the Biden administration, the public’s attention has been suddenly diverted to a new, critical issue—Elon Musk’s involvement with DOGE. His efforts, aimed at tackling waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending, have ignited a firestorm of opposition from many prominent Democrats, raising questions about the direction of American politics and the priorities of its leaders. One must wonder why anyone would be against waste, fraud, and abuse in spending.

The public and political elite have long been preoccupied with a litany of pressing issues. Open borders, escalating crime rates, the environmental havoc from hurricanes and wildfires, the tragedy in East Palestine, the war in Ukraine, and the growing global instability in the Middle East had flown under the radar of the Biden administration. Yet, despite these national and international crises, it is Musk’s project to curtail government spending that has earned the ire of the Democratic establishment. The establishment’s fury at Musk’s efforts to address systemic waste stands in stark contrast to their inaction on other critical issues.

While billions of taxpayer dollars are funneled into questionable foreign initiatives—from funding programs like DEI scholarships and transgender initiatives to cultural outreach programs like Sesame Street in Iraq—many see these expenditures as symptomatic of a larger, unchecked problem. Musk’s DOGE initiative has become a major point of contention in this debate, as it seeks to challenge how taxpayer money is allocated, scrutinizing government spending in ways that many entrenched politicians do not appreciate. I believe this outrageous spending in foreign countries is a way of laundering money back to corrupt politicians. Calling it foreign aid makes it more difficult to track.

The reaction from figures like Senator Warren, Representative Ocasio-Cortez, Representative Tlaib, and other Democratic leaders has been severe. They have leveled harsh criticisms at Musk’s efforts, accusing him of undermining the system and threatening to expose entrenched corruption. Maxine Waters has voiced her concerns, as Chuck Schumer has, even going so far as to call Musk’s movement a “shadow government.” These responses suggest there is much at stake—beyond the surface-level frustrations about DOGE’s potential to curb waste. Every politician should want to weed out fraud and abuse of taxpayer dollars, unless of course they are the beneficiaries.

DOGE, through Musk’s involvement, is stirring up long-standing frustrations about a government system that has turned a blind eye to issues at home while enabling questionable expenditures abroad. It has allowed taxpayer money to be spent irresponsibly—on everything from foreign aid that funds programs unrelated to American interests to domestic policies that critics see as misguided and out of touch with the needs of the people.

The ongoing debates surrounding DOGE highlight an underlying tension: those in power are not simply opposed to DOGE, but to the very idea of a system that could be held accountable for its spending decisions. By challenging the status quo, Musk’s venture into addressing these concerns has become a focal point of political discourse, shining a light on the corruption and inefficiencies that have taken root in the government.

A significant part of this debate is the idea of change, and the praise for this shift in focus goes to the Trump administration. During his first time in office, President Trump often criticized government waste, pointing to foreign spending and internal mismanagement. Musk’s DOGE efforts are a continuation of Trump’s “America First” agenda, where the needs of American citizens are prioritized over global initiatives that may not align with national interests.

Trump’s vocal opposition to a bloated government bureaucracy resonates with those who see DOGE as a vehicle for transparency and accountability. The connection between Trump’s rhetoric and Musk’s initiatives brings the conversation full circle, making it clear that the fight against government waste and fraud is now a focal point of national politics.

As the debate over DOGE unfolds, it’s clear the United States finds itself divided over what constitutes true governance. While some see Musk’s efforts as a step toward accountability, others view it as a dangerous disruption to the established order. One thing is certain: DOGE has uncovered the deep divisions within the political system, forcing a reckoning over the country’s priorities. Is it more important to continue funding foreign programs that critics deem frivolous, or should the government focus on addressing issues that have long been neglected?

Most, Americans believe DOGE is the key to uncovering the corruption that have plagued the system.