It’s difficult to determine her position on any subject

By now, it’s obvious where President Trump stands on issues. He’s never shy about stating his positions, repeating them often in rally’s. We also have the experience of his past presidential term as insight, and it wasn’t so bad.

Not so much his opponent, Border Czar Kamala Harris. It’s difficult to determine her position on any subject. There is recorded proof she said one thing a few years ago but has since “reversed” those opinions now as a presidential candidate. Nobody has a clear picture of where she stands on issues, which should be troubling for voters.

Do you have acquaintances that might vote for Harris. If so, ask them what they specifically like about Harris. Their answer will most likely be because she isn’t Trump, a rather poor excuse for one to cast their vote.

Looking into what her positions might be, I used three sources – the New York Post, the BBC, and the Washington Compost. I waded through her flip-flops to see if I could understand her positions.

Before being tapped for president, Harris’s positions during her first run for president in 2019 were:

• Elimination of private health insurance.
• Decriminalize illegal border crossings.
• Ban fracking.
• Ban new gas-powered cars by 2035.
• Mandatory buy backs of guns.
• Promoting the Green New Deal, a $2 trillion boondoggle.
• Opposed building a wall at the border while supporting policies allowing illegal immigrants to enter the country without issue.
• Supported increasing the corporate tax rate to 35%, up from 21%.
• Increase taxes on those earning more than $400,000.
• Medicare-for-All, making all health care publicly funded.
• Erase billions of dollars of medical debt.

Her stated positions have since changed as follows:

• Ban assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
• Push for universal background checks.
• Roll back the filibuster
• Opposing policies restricting how schools can educate students in race and sexual orientation
• Construct a border wall, more border agents, and stricter consequences for people crossing the border illegally.

What changed her positions other than she received the nomination for president due to Biden’s infirmity?

Her softened approach to ban certain guns is probably a deception. Most socialist regimes go after the guns of the citizenry – it ensures they won’t fight back. First its assault weapons, next will be shotguns and/or revolvers. Once accomplished, the 2^nd Amendment will be worthless.   

Rolling back the filibuster is her way to reinstall Roe v. Wade nationally, regardless of SCOTUS rulings. There are other issues that would come into play with removing the filibuster but the abortion issue seems to be utmost on her mind.

She is a strong supporter of a woman’s right to abort babies, central to her campaign. This is in opposition to her Baptist religion, or the Jewish religion, as her husband is Jewish.

Her opposition to policies that restrict how schools can teach students about race and sexuality is evil. This is an end around to limit parents’ rights to what their child is exposed to, such as matters of sexual orientation and/or doctrines of revisionist history.

Her seismic shift for a border wall and hiring more Border Patrol agents is highly debatable. While being vice president and border czar, her Administration under Biden has allowed for over 8 million illegal immigrants to enter the country. Now she is pledging millions at the problem after the horse is out of the barn.

Under a Harris presidency the US will continue to send money to Ukraine in what in my opinion is a losing cause unless we personally put boots on the ground.  She will be unable to coral Putin to stop the war, whereas there might be a chance Trump will. Ukraine aid is another quagmire like Afghanistan or Viet Nam.

She has raised concerns over the humanitarian catastrophe for Palestinians and charged Israel with ending their assault. Recall it Hamas and several other Palestinian militant groups that bombed Israel first.

How can votes be cast for a candidate when it’s unknown what she might do. She was the most liberal senator in America, left of even Bernie Sanders. Now she has altered significant positions to appear more moderate in the election and they seem bogus.

I don’t think Harris actually has any positions that are hers, but she is more a “holistic” figurehead answering to a cabal of Deep State Democrats telling her what her positions are.

Don’t trust her, folks. She’s bad for America. We had four years of President Trump and life was much better than it has been under the Biden/Harris Administration.